Monday, May 29, 2023

California Court Orders Lake County to Set Aside Approval of Mega-Resort


The following is a press release from the Center for Biological Diversity:

Guenoc Valley Development Site Lake County, CA Wildfire Burn 2020 Center for Biological Diversity Drew Bird Photography San Francisco Bay Area Photographer http://www.drewbirdphoto.com

 A judge has ruled that Lake County must set aside its approval of an ultra-luxury development in Northern California’s Guenoc Valley because it failed to consider the effect on community safety and wildfire evacuation from bringing thousands of new residents and visitors to the highly fire-prone area.

The ruling, issued Tuesday in response to a Center for Biological Diversity lawsuit, prohibits the massive resort from moving forward. The undeveloped 16,000-acre project site contains oak woodlands, wildlife corridors and habitat for sensitive wildlife species, including golden eagles, foothill yellow-legged frogs and western pond turtles.

“The court recognized that Lake County failed in one of its most important jobs, which was to consider how dangerous development in the path of fire can increase risks to surrounding communities,” said Peter Broderick, a Center attorney. “Given the fire threats facing California, I hope decisionmakers and developers come to see how absolutely crucial it is to consider evacuation challenges when building projects this risky. No developer should be allowed to make it harder for people to escape deadly fires.”

In 2020 the board of supervisors approved the sprawling resort and residential development on the property, which has a long history of wildfires and has burned repeatedly. A month after the county approved the project, the deadly LNU Lightning Complex fires tore through the property, causing evacuations and damage in the area.

Many fires are ignited by human sources, and low-density development increases fire risk.

- Advertisement -

The Center sued the county, declaring that the environmental review for the project violated the California Environmental Quality Act. In 2021 the state attorney general joined the lawsuit against the county, citing wildfire and other environmental concerns.

Tuesday’s ruling from Lake County Superior Court confirmed that the county’s findings on wildfire evacuation routes were not supported by substantial evidence and its environmental review did not comply with CEQA. The decision noted that a significant number of wildfire-related deaths in California occur during attempts to evacuate.

“The recent history of wildfires has taught us that we need to be prepared for the next disaster,” Broderick said. “Part of that preparation is making sound land-use decisions and only approving developments that adequately address, not worsen, wildfire risks. Building in California’s fire-prone wildlands is dangerous for people and terrible for our imperiled wildlife.”

- Advertisement -


  1. Another pipe dream of income producing development in the County of Lake. The schemes have been many over the decades and they always seem to fizzle out before completed. Planning a huge isolated development with limited access or egress to fight or escape fires is not a good idea. Maybe one day Lake County will find that perfect plan that employs the unemployed and pays high taxes and fees to the county coffers , until then they will continue to dream of what could be in “Never-ever Land”.

    • The “Center for Biological Diversity” doesn’t care about people being able to escape wild fires. That’s all a bunch of bull. It was their legal argument to get it shut down. Its about saving the yellow footed frog. Meanwhile the county continues to suffer from high unemployment, meth and opiate addiction, terrible low paying jobs, and crime. You tree hugging idiots are destroying this state. No wonder everyone is leaving.

      • I agree with Nad! This project could have made a huge change in the economic future for Lake County.
        Marking another potential development project down the drain, makes this one shitty situation for those who reside and call Lake County home.

  2. That is what the CEQA is for, to allow lawsuits. It is possible for the project proponents to correct the deficiencies in the project design and CEQA document and try again. Fire protection and evacuation routes are very important. Also I believe some areas are too dangerous to be developed, though I do not know if this is one of those areas.

Join the Conversation

Matt LaFever
Matt LaFeverhttps://mendofever.com/
I like to think of myself as a reporter for the Average Joe. Journalism has become a craft defined largely by city dwellers on America's coasts. It’s time to take it back. I have been an Emerald Triangle resident since 2006 and this is year ten in Mendocino County. Please, email me at matthewplafever@gmail.com if you know a story that needs to be told.

Today's News


News from the Week