Monday, May 16, 2022
Call Us

39 New Cases of COVID-19 Identified in Mendocino County


The following is Mendocino County Public Health’s information published on their Facebook page regarding the most recent updates to the County’s COVID-19 dashboard. Other information regarding the virus amassed by MendoFever’s Judy Valado is below the information provided by the county:

Mendocino County COVID-19 Dashboard from September 3, 2021

Daily COVID-19 Update – 9/03/2021 39 additional cases of COVID-19 have been identified in Mendocino County, bringing the total to 6,192.

*****Actualización Diaria COVID-19 de ayer – 03/9/2021Se han identificado 39 casos adicionales de COVID-19 en el condado de Mendocino, con un total de 6,192.

  • SEPTEMBER 3, 2021
  • 1 AGES 0-5 YEARS
  • 3 AGES 6-12 YEARS
  • -1 AGES 13-18 YEARS
  • 17 AGES 19-34 YEARS
  • 7 AGES 35-49 YEARS
  • 1 AGES 50-64 YEARS
  • 5 AGES 65+ YEARS
From Mendocino County Public Health
From Mendocino County Public Health


  1. still using the PCR test???? Dr. Kary Mullis invented it and thought it was an inappropriate means of determination. yet that is what being used (prove me wrong).
    many many false positives…from what i have learned in the 90% level depending on the cycle rate

    Dr. Jane Orient: Where Are the Autopsies of People Dying Post COVID Vaccine?

    why has fauci/fda illegalized ivermectin and HCQ?? big pharma maybe???

    fauci’s solution is to place hospital patients 2 wks into the course on Remdesivir ..screws your kidneys and causes pulmonary edema = death sentence.

    why is ivermectin or HCQ not being prescribed early on? witness this data:

    wake the friek up mendo county.

  2. “These results are definitely not what you were sold by the CDC, Fauci, Trump, Biden, your State Health Department and all the advertising on the TeeVee and social media. You were sold nearly 100% effectiveness sufficient to remove your fear of getting Covid-19. What you actually got is more akin to what you get out of the flu shot if you take it each year: Some attenuation of risk but, in many cases, absolutely nothing of value.
    The difference is that unlike the flu shot that rarely harms anyone beyond a sore arm for a day or two (last year’s flu shot campaign, which delivered about 170 million doses, recorded 26 associated deaths) VAERS says that 13,627 deaths and nearly 56,000 hospitalizations have been associated with these jabs — thus far.
    In other words on a reasonable “back of the envelope” analysis the Covid-19 jabs are close to 500 times more-likely to kill you than the flu shot is and have no better record in preventing you from getting Covid-19 than the flu shot does in preventing you from getting the flu.” ragin dave

  3. One of the main issues that clearly needs definition is what technically defines ‘Unvaccinated’ these days. As it seems in other regions/states/counties there has been this latency issue which can technically lump individuals who have participated in receiving a vaccination suddenly fall into the category of un-jabbed.

    Such as this definition which was immediately pulled due to the response from the public in St. Louis but luckily was archived online for others to see what was trying to be slipped through.

    “Fully Vaccinated Person ” means a person who 14 days prior received a second dose of a 2 dose series or 14 days prior received one dose of a single dose vaccine.  A person is not fully vaccinated until this time period of 14 days from the last date of the required dose has lapsed. Additionally, after 3 months from the last dose, a person is no longer considered to be a Fully Vaccinated Person.

    You’ll see similar wording in other regions such as Los Angeles. With the key point being 3 months of the last dose.

    As the booster shot will be coming around the corner, and more of the ‘3 months from last dose’ seems to be appearing at other states/counties. I would imagine that many individuals might be surprised in the near future that should they slip a few days or weeks out of that 3 month window or hesitate on receiving the 3rd, and possibly 4th, 5th, 6th booster. While it may be considered a partial vaccination, the media has been slowly bundling/shaming those same individuals as the unvaccinated.

    Needless to say, if you’re an investor in big pharma, this is great news. The public will be forced to keep taking these vaccines all the way into 2025 and investors are salivating at the profitability.

    So every time I hear someone ask if a product is free of GMO’s at the local market/restaurant. Or whine/complain about genetically engineered crops or scoff at genetically engineered salmon and would never imagine taking a bite. Yet give no pause or consideration at the sheer hypocrisy of injecting a genetically engineered product directly into their tissue. I chuckle. Since these individuals shout Monsanto bad, Big Pharma bad, 1% bad, and now suddenly they reverse course since they’re operating out of fear. Suddenly the organic movement takes a back seat, and those same large corporations that were protested against or weary of now have become our new buddies.

    Run the numbers yourself, compliments of Oxford University… trust the science.

  4. You guys are spot on, and the ignorantly bliss people living in bubbles shouting you are killing people with your misinformation..all the while posting media garble and fauci is my hero, etc. Makes me sick to see how stupid the general population has become. The jabbed ones are going to start suffering once the long term side effects start coming to light.

    • While we’re at it, how about a couple of facts to drive the point home.

      Are the mRNA drugs experimental? YES!
      Read up on the Code of Federal Regulations 21CFE Subchapter D Part 312

      “Clinical investigation means any experiment in which a drug is administered or dispensed to, or used involving, one or more human subjects. For the purposes of this part, an experiment is any use of a drug except for the use of a marketed drug in the course of medical practice.”

      The mRNA drug is an EUA (Emergency Use Authorized) product which is considered an INVESTIGATIONAL/EXPERIMENTAL product.
      Heck, even your own authority… the FDA commissioner says it is investigational.

      Q: An employer or school cannot require someone to get a vaccine issued under an EUA, right?

      A: Institutions may require individuals to take an FDA-approved vaccine or apply for an exception. However, EUA products are still considered investigational.

      An investigational drug can also be called an EXPERIMENTAL drug and is being studied to see if your disease or medical condition improves while taking it. (FDA’s own words)

      Think about that the next time your medical provider assures you that these drugs are not investigational/experimental.

      Which in the end leaves you with the current mess as provided in the most recent fact sheet from the FDA and most locals spewing out the drug being licensed/approved while slipping into the same bucket as the EUA therapeutic.

      In it you’ll find the following:

      Under the EUA, it is your choice to receive or not receive the vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.

      *This EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine AND COMIRNATY will end when the Secretary of HHS determines that the circumstances justifying the EUA no longer exist or when there is a change in the approval status of the product such that an EUA is no longer needed.

      Comirnaty AND the Pfizer-Biontech are considered EUA… stated in their own fact sheet. They’ve mingled the legalities of Comirnaty in saying that it is the same ingredient being utilized. But have avoided liability issues by skirting under the Emergency Use Authorization and since there is a messload of EUA vaccines in current inventory. Most individuals are going to receive an EUA drug which has to follow EUA guidelines which includes informed consent and the right to refuse. Yet they’re trying to push the burden/liabilities associated with that mandate to the employer/businesses because they know they cannot mandate an EUA on a Federal level if challenged.

      21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 – Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies

      (III)of the option to accept or REFUSE administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

      However mandating LICENSED vaccines is a different story. So which is it, forcing an employee to take an EUA or Comirnaty? Or will it be the unsuspecting employee taking the EUA while thinking it has the legalities of a licensed vaccine Comirnaty when it actually does not. That is what you’ll be watching unfold. They’re just confusing the public by mixing up ‘Authorized’ and ‘Approved’ and getting away with it.

      To simplify. Comirnaty is FDA approved. Pfizer-BioNTech is FDA authorized (for emergency use). Currently there is no Comirnaty being distributed/manufactured so they’re dishing out Pfizer’s mRNA under EUA guidelines and hoping you don’t question it.

      What you’re witnessing is big pharma trying to avoid full accountability. Feel free to ask the next time you get your jab/booster if you’re receiving the FDA licensed Comirnaty drug or when it will be available while your employer tries to mandate it. Furthermore all normal protocols in manufacturing the drug with strict oversight falls completely by the wayside with EUA’s. As good manufacturing practice requirements are literally kicked to the curb.

      Which may explain various cases of contaminated product(s). Such as a recent episode in Japan.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Today's News

Perfect Union Sidebar Advertisement
Perfect Union Sidebar Advertisement
Perfect Union Sidebar Advertisement
Perfect Union Sidebar Advertisement
How Can I Support MendoFever?

News from the Week

%d bloggers like this: